ASDA and Morrisons make a move on light bulbs

Posted by jamie — 26 July 2007 at 5:30pm - Comments

We're beginning to see the first positive results from the light bulb retailers league table we published nearly two weeks ago. Both ASDA and Morrisons have just announced they will improve their game plan and phase out those power-crazy incandescents by the end of 2010, which moves them a couple of places up the league table, leapfrogging several other retailers.

They were languishing near the bottom with no commitment to get rid of inefficient bulbs, although the relatively low price of their efficient compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) placed them ahead of wooden spoon winner Woolworths. The twin announcements puts them ahead of fellow F-graders Ikea and Somerfield, as well those hiding behind the weak and unambitious government voluntary target who will only be incandescent-free in 2011. So the table now looks like this.

We're still waiting to get the full details from ASDA, but Morrisons was "disappointed" it had been given such a low rating, and was keen to point out the new measures designed to shift shoppers over to CFLs. They're working on more promotions, more shelf space devoted to them, as well as phasing out incandescents with very high wattages by the end of this year.

The fact that two major supermarkets are breaking ranks with the rest and moving ahead of the government's advice shows that our campaign is working. But we want them to do better. Strip those shelves of energy-gobbling bulbs by the end of the year and you'll sit alongside Currys at the top of the league table. Go on, you know you can do it.

David - fair point, Currys may not be the biggest light bulb retailer so making the switch from incandescents to CFLs was probably easier for them, but the fact is they've done it. They're not relying on excuses about customer demand to hide behind. Sainsbury's shelving arrangements sound interesting - do you have any more info about that?

The problem with the government's policy is that it's purely voluntary - there will be nothing obliging retailers to stop selling incandescent bulbs, even by 2011. As we've seen so many times in the past, companies tend to make change only if they're forced to, either through customer demand or legislation. And there certainly are CFLs out there that are not as good as others, but again legislation for minimum energy and performance standards would be able to solve that.

Jethro - good point about the dimmable bulbs, although again if retailers are stocking nothing but CFLs, then they'll have to widen their ranges. Here's hoping!

web editor
gpuk

Hi Ivanwain,

Thanks for posting but please don't spam - once is enough. I've taken the liberty of moving the post above (which you posted on a different page) to this page; all the other pages you posted on had no other comments so it made more sense to have it here.

I think what you're getting at is the argument that incandescent bulbs also provide some level of heating. Yes, they do but it's a really inefficient and expensive way of heating your house. Most domestic heating in the UK is provided by gas, so if you're relying on your electrically-powered 60W bulb to supplement your heating, you're using a different source of energy.

Electrical heating differs from gas heating in that it is woefully inefficient - not necessarily where it's used in central heating, but where it's generated. Two-thirds of the energy available in fuel used to generate electricity is lost as heat. So even before the electricity reaches your home, vast quantities of potential energy is thrown away.

Combined heat and power however, helps solve the problem - capture that waste heat and use it to warm nearby buildings. It's like killing two birds with one stone - burn one lump of fuel to provide both electricity and heat, rather than burning two lumps as we do at the moment.

Either way, using bulbs for heating is a bad move.

web editor
gpuk

David - fair point, Currys may not be the biggest light bulb retailer so making the switch from incandescents to CFLs was probably easier for them, but the fact is they've done it. They're not relying on excuses about customer demand to hide behind. Sainsbury's shelving arrangements sound interesting - do you have any more info about that? The problem with the government's policy is that it's purely voluntary - there will be nothing obliging retailers to stop selling incandescent bulbs, even by 2011. As we've seen so many times in the past, companies tend to make change only if they're forced to, either through customer demand or legislation. And there certainly are CFLs out there that are not as good as others, but again legislation for minimum energy and performance standards would be able to solve that. Jethro - good point about the dimmable bulbs, although again if retailers are stocking nothing but CFLs, then they'll have to widen their ranges. Here's hoping! web editor gpuk

Hi Ivanwain, Thanks for posting but please don't spam - once is enough. I've taken the liberty of moving the post above (which you posted on a different page) to this page; all the other pages you posted on had no other comments so it made more sense to have it here. I think what you're getting at is the argument that incandescent bulbs also provide some level of heating. Yes, they do but it's a really inefficient and expensive way of heating your house. Most domestic heating in the UK is provided by gas, so if you're relying on your electrically-powered 60W bulb to supplement your heating, you're using a different source of energy. Electrical heating differs from gas heating in that it is woefully inefficient - not necessarily where it's used in central heating, but where it's generated. Two-thirds of the energy available in fuel used to generate electricity is lost as heat. So even before the electricity reaches your home, vast quantities of potential energy is thrown away. Combined heat and power however, helps solve the problem - capture that waste heat and use it to warm nearby buildings. It's like killing two birds with one stone - burn one lump of fuel to provide both electricity and heat, rather than burning two lumps as we do at the moment. Either way, using bulbs for heating is a bad move. web editor gpuk

About Jamie

I'm a forests campaigner working mainly on Indonesia. My personal mumblings can be found @shrinkydinky.

Follow Greenpeace UK